Skip to content
Ze Finance
← All the news

#MARKETS & INVESTING

The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance puts the bitcoin network's annual electricity use at 138 TWh, or roughly 0.5% of world electricity consumption.

Published on August 26, 2026 · to be rechecked on May 1, 2027

Ze Finance fact card: Markets & investing
138 TWh, 0.5% the annual electricity consumption of bitcoin mining estimated by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, about 0.5% of global electricity use

The Cambridge Digital Mining Industry Report, published on 28 April 2025 by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance at Cambridge Judge Business School, is built on a survey of 49 mining firms, 41% of them publicly listed, operating across 23 countries and accounting for 48% of reported global mining activity. It puts annual network consumption at 138 TWh, roughly 0.5% of world electricity use, and associated emissions at 39.8 MtCO2e. It also measures the energy mix: 52.4% low-carbon sources (42.6% renewables, 9.8% nuclear), with natural gas rising to 38.2% from 25.0% in 2022 and coal falling to 8.9% from 36.6%. The International Energy Agency reaches the same order of magnitude by a different route in its Electricity 2024 report: about 110 TWh for all cryptocurrencies in 2022, or 0.4% of global electricity demand, with a projection of around 160 TWh by 2026.

Does bitcoin really use as much electricity as an entire country?

Cambridge puts mining at 138 TWh a year, about 0.5% of world electricity. The IEA measures 110 TWh for all cryptocurrencies in 2022, or 0.4% of global demand.

In other words: the order of magnitude is that of a mid-sized country, not a continent.

Four caveats, because they matter

  • The 138 TWh comes from a survey covering 48% of mining activity: the rest is extrapolated, not measured.
  • The same centre publishes a model-based index, the CBECI, which returns a materially higher figure: two methods from one lab do not agree.
  • The IEA covers all cryptocurrencies, Cambridge covers bitcoin alone: the two numbers do not map onto each other exactly.
  • Consumption is not a carbon footprint: 52.4% of the reported mix is low-carbon, which shifts the question from how much energy to where it comes from.

Why it still matters: the argument turns less on a single number than on its uncertainty: two serious methods applied to the same network do not produce the same result.

For you

  • Can a figure on which two methods from the same lab disagree settle an argument?
  • Did you know bitcoin mining accounts for roughly 0.5% of the world's electricity consumption?

Source: Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, "Cambridge Digital Mining Industry Report", Cambridge Judge Business School, 28 April 2025; International Energy Agency, "Electricity 2024", January 2024.

View the source →

Download the fact card in high resolution (1856 × 2304) ↓